Ranks

This took me about 27 minutes to type and check spelling because I am on mobile not pc

But I got it done. As I said before, comment names of the ranks because I am bad at it 😂

Materials for BEGINNERS III is 10,000 materials.

Materials for BEGINNERS II is 25,000 materials or $5.

Materials for BEGINNERS I is 50,000 materials or $10.

Materials for MODERATE III is 100,000 materials or $15.

Materials for MODERATE II is 500,000 materials or $20.

Materials for MODERATE I is 1,000,000 materials or $25.

Materials for PROFESSIONAL III is 10,000,000 materials or $30.

Materials for PROFESSIONAL II is 50,000,000 materials or $35.

Materials for PROFESSIONAL I is 100,000,000 materials or $40.

Materials for MASTER is 1,000,000,000 materials or $50.

Um. You do know that this is fan made. Although that is Murgle and Drongo's decision.

As in Murgle and Drongo being fans of Antzzz but decided the server is useless. So they're making their own.

But like I said, it's up to the dev team whether they want in game purchases or ads

I was thinking about army size before writing it but it didn't seem right to do so.

You could die in army and lose your rank. Then you'll need to start from the beginning.

Unlike hf, you only lose some of it, you won't lose all of it.

But still you could push back in rank because of chain...hmmm

I GOT IT! Everytime you attack a player and win a battle, you will earn 10 trophies and these trophies decides your rank(depending on what trophies count you are at, higher you go more you get(will also depend on what kind of opponent you attack like PRO attacking beginner wouldn't get much trophies, but pro vs pro, you'll get more).

What you think?

~Darthace21

I dont like the idea of ranking based on HF or having to "buy" your ranks. Its better to be based on something that can be changed once achieved. Many alliances has chains, and someone with a lot more experienced and likes being a hunter may never go above 25 million simply because he is a hunter, but may contain overall better stats in anthill and technology than, lets say, a famer with 100 million simply for the fact that he's been on longer than the farmer. Also, someone may be in alliance and grow so much faster than someone outside an alliance due to gaining resources from the alliance, but they maintain a relatively small amount of HF for what ever reason. I find in my alliance, smaller members gain wealth of knowledge from others as well as gaining stats faster which i believe should, in a way, show in the final result. Another factor in Hunting field is just being attacked by whoever. Someone outside of an alliance may never reach a certain HF requirment to achieve a higher ranking, but may have far more experience than someone who does. All this leads me to believe that a ranking system solely based on HF is no goood.

What i would recommend would be to incorporate a system that uses tech and anthill as well a time. You could collect something like "stars" and you have to collect so many in order to achieve to the next level. You can collect stars by upgrading buildings/tech, attacking people (and doing things such as killing and army, gain a certain amount of XP, colonization, ect.), joining an alliance, sending messages in General/Alliance chat, as well as collecting HF. This demonstrates more about the knowledge the player has rather than a simple factor that can be easily manipulated.